This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Hidradenitis suppurativa in axillary mass tissue under microscope, pink and purple
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) Learning Zone

Transcript: European guideline updates

Last updated: 16th Oct 2024
Published: 16th Oct 2024

Dr Thrasyvoulos Tzellos

Interview recorded Sep 2024. All transcripts are created from interview footage and directly reflect the content of the interview at the time. The content is that of the speaker and is not adjusted by Medthority.

First of all, in this Congress, in this EADV Congress, it was the first time that they recently accepted and soon-to-be-published European guidelines, new European guidelines were presented. And actually, we have many important new points. First of all, it was assessed through an evidence-based analysis and also with a full consensus that both adalimumab and bimekizumab and secukinumab should be considered as first-line treatment after failure of one correct round of antibiotic use.

But shall we use adalimumab to all our patients, or shall we use bimekizumab to all our patients? So the guidelines have a critical point regarding this as well. So we do know that when fistulas are present, the effect of adalimumab becomes much more lower. So the odds ratio to achieve significant clinical effect becomes much lower with adalimumab when fistulas are present. So it is easy to hypothesise that when we have a patient only with nodules and abscesses, yes, it makes sense to start with adalimumab since it is also cheaper. But we do have evidence that interleukin-17 inhibitors have a higher effect against draining tunnels, evidence that have been shown also in this EADV Congress. So it makes sense that when we have already presence of draining tunnels, of draining fistulas, to go over adalimumab use and start directly with interleukin-17 inhibition, either secukinumab or bimekizumab. Furthermore, it was suggested that in order to assess severity, in order to assess a non-mild disease, it is better to use the validated outcome of IHS4 mild, moderate, and severe because it serves the window of opportunity treatment much more than Hurley staging. And also it was suggested to use IHS4 55% reduction to assess treatment effect. And furthermore, it was suggested that when it comes to antibiotics, tetracycline should be considered as the first-line treatment in the right manner of use for 12 to 16 weeks. And practically, clindamycin and rifampicin seems to have the same effect with tetracycline.

View the video

Complete the form below to receive our regular round-up of the latest clinical news and medical education resources on Medthority, straight to your inbox.

* = required information 

 

By providing your email address, you are opting in to receive our monthly newsletter.

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the ‘unsubscribe’ link found at the bottom of every email.