Efficacy and cardiovascular safety profile of dual bronchodilation therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A bidimensional comparative analysis across fixed-dose combinations.
Efficacy and cardiovascular safety profile of dual bronchodilation therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A bidimensional comparative analysis across fixed-dose combinations
Despite several long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are currently approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there are limited findings concerning the direct comparison across the different LABA/LAMA FDCs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy/safety profile of approved LABA/LAMA FDCs in COPD.
A network meta-analysis was performed by linking the efficacy (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, St’ George Respiratory Questionnaire, transitional dyspnea index) and safety (cardiovascular serious adverse events) outcomes resulting from randomized controlled trials that directly compared LABA/LAMA FDCs with placebo and/or each other. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve Analysis (SUCRA) was performed for each single outcome (SUCRA: 1 = best, 0 = worst). The combined efficacy/safety profile was reported via the novel Improved Bidimensional SUCRA score (IBiS: the higher the value the better the treatment). Data obtained from 12,136 COPD patients (79.50% LABA/LAMA FDCs vs. placebo; 20.50% direct comparison between different LABA/LAMA FDCs) were extracted from 22 studies published between 2013 and 2019. The IBiS score showed the following rank of efficacy/safety profile: tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 μg (area 66.83%) » glycopyrronium/indacaterol 15.6/27.5 μg (area 40.43%) > umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg (area 30.48%) ≈ aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg (area 28.44%) > glycopyrronium/indacaterol 50/110 μg (area 19.95%) > glycopyrronium/formoterol 14.4/9.6 μg (area 11.50%). Each available LABA/LAMA FDC has a specific efficacy/safety profile that needs to be considered for personalized therapy in COPD. Head-to-head studies aimed to assess the impact of different LABA/LAMA FDCs on the risk of COPD exacerbation are needed to further improve the information provided by this quantitative synthesis.