This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Journals
  • Home
  • /
  • Journals
  • /
  • Osteoarthritis
  • /
  • Neurobiology of osteoarthritis: a systematic revie...
Journal

Neurobiology of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis

Read time: 1 mins
Published:1st Aug 2023
Author: Hall M, Dobson F, Klyne DM, Zheng CJ, Lima YL, Egorova-Brumley N.
Availability: Free full text
Ref.:Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 1;13(1):12442.
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-39245-9
Neurobiology of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis


Osteoarthritis (OA) affects 240 million people worldwide. Neuroimaging has been increasingly used to investigate brain changes in OA, however, there is considerable heterogeneity in reported results. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesise existing literature and identify consistent brain alterations in OA. Six databases were searched from inception up to June, 2022. Full-texts of original human studies were included if they had: (i) neuroimaging data by site of OA (e.g. hand, knee, hip); (ii) data in healthy controls (HC); (iii) > 10 participants. Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) was conducted using GingerALE software on studies that reported peak activation coordinates and sample size. Our search strategy identified 6250 articles. Twenty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, of which 18 were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in brain structure or function between OA and healthy control contrasts. In exploratory analysis, the right insula was associated with OA vs healthy controls, with less activity, connectivity and brain volume in OA. This region was implicated in both knee and hip OA, with an additional cluster in the medial prefrontal cortex observed only in the contrast between healthy controls and the hip OA subgroup, suggesting a possible distinction between the neural correlates of OA subtypes. Despite the limitations associated with heterogeneity and poor study quality, this synthesis identified neurobiological outcomes associated with OA, providing insight for future research. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021238735.


Read abstract on library site    Access full article