This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Journals
  • Home
  • /
  • Journals
  • /
  • Chronic Cough
  • /
  • Chronic cough-the limitation and advances in asses...
Journal

Chronic cough-the limitation and advances in assessment techniques

Read time: 1 mins
Published:1st Dec 2022
Author: Zhang M, Sykes DL, Brindle K, Sadofsky LR, Morice AH.
Availability: Free full text
Ref.:J Thorac Dis. 2022 Dec;14(12):5097-5119.
DOI:10.21037/jtd-22-874
Chronic cough-the limitation and advances in assessment techniques


Accurate and consistent assessments of cough are essential to advance the understanding of the mechanisms of cough and individualised the management of patients. Considerable progress has been made in this work. Here we reviewed the currently available tools for subjectively and objectively measuring both cough sensitivity and severity. We also provided some opinions on the new techniques and future directions. The simple and practical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and the Cough Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) are the most widely used self-reported questionnaires for evaluating and quantifying cough severity. The Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) is a tool to elucidate the constellation of symptoms underlying the diagnosis of chronic cough. Chemical excitation tests are widely used to explore the pathophysiological mechanisms of the cough reflex, such as capsaicin, citric acid and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) challenge test. Cough frequency is an ideal primary endpoint for clinical research, but the application of cough counters has been limited in clinical practice by the high cost and reliance on aural validation. The ongoing development of cough detection technology for smartphone apps and wearable devices will hopefully simplify cough counting, thus transitioning it from niche research to a widely available clinical application.


Read abstract on library site  Access full article