HyBryte Shows Positive Outcomes in CTCL

The trial is sponsored by Ellen Kim, MD, Director, Penn Cutaneous Lymphoma Program, Vice Chair of Clinical Operations, Dermatology Department, and Professor of Dermatology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania who was a leading enroller in the Phase III FLASH (Fluorescent Light Activated Synthetic Hypericin) study for the treatment of early-stage CTCL. To date, nine patients have been enrolled and treated with HyBryte over a time period of up to 54 weeks. Patients have responded positively to HyBryte therapy, with over 70% (5 of the 6 subjects who have completed at least 18 weeks of therapy) already achieving "Treatment Success". Treatment Success is predefined in the study's protocol as a greater than or equal to 50% improvement in the cumulative mCAILS (modified Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity) score compared to Baseline. Of the five Treatment Successes, three were achieved within the first 12 weeks of treatment, with two patients achieving a "complete response" by 18 weeks. Of the remaining patients, two have recently started the study and two had to drop from the study for logistical reasons (e.g., need to care for an elderly parent), with one showing a substantial improvement (>30%) by their Week 18 visit. In addition, HyBryte appears to be safe and well tolerated in all patients.

The complete response rate, consistent treatment response and safety profile across multiple clinical studies to date with HyBrytehas been exciting to see," noted Dr. Kim, Principal Investigator of the IIS and Lead Investigator of the FLASH2 study. "In the first Phase III FLASH study, HyBryte was shown to be efficacious with a benign safety profile compared to the current therapies of steroids, chemotherapeutics and ultraviolet light in this chronic orphan disease. With limited treatment options, especially in the early stages of their disease, CTCL patients are often searching for alternative treatments. In our FDA-funded study, initial results evaluating the expanded use of HyBryte in a "real world" treatment setting remain very promising, further supporting and extending results from the previous positive Phase II and III clinical trials. We look forward to continuing to work with the FDA to complete this study while we participate in the confirmatory Phase III placebo-controlled FLASH2 study."

"We are pleased with these recent study results and that the FDA is continuing to financially support the HyBryte program, giving patients an opportunity to access the therapy in an open-label setting," stated Christopher J. Schaber, PhD, President and Chief Executive Officer of Soligenix. "CTCL is an incredibly difficult to treat orphan disease and remains an area of unmet medical need with a very limited number of safe and effective treatment options. Following the initial Phase III FLASH study, which demonstrated the safety and efficacy of shorter courses of HyBryte  therapy, we are pleased to see that continuing treatment for longer time periods is resulting in the anticipated improved outcomes for patients. As the body of compelling data continues to grow in support of this novel therapy, we look forward to continuing to work with Dr. Kim on this important study as well as advancing enrollment in the 80-patient confirmatory Phase III FLASH2 replication study. We will plan to provide additional updates on the IIS as data becomes available."

The clinical study RW-HPN-MF-01, "Assessment of Treatment with Visible Light Activated Synthetic Hypericin Ointment in Mycosis Fungoides Patients" is designed as an open-label, multicenter clinical trial enrolling approximately 20 patients in the U.S. Patients have the potential to be treated for up to 12 months with twice a week dosing (visible light activation following ointment application by 24 ± 6 hours). The study also allows for potential transition to a "real-world" setting with home-use. The primary endpoint for the study is evaluating the number of treatment successes defined as ≥50% reduction in the cumulative mCAILS score from Baseline to end of the treatment.

The published Phase III FLASH trial enrolled a total of 169 patients (166 evaluable) with Stage IA, IB or IIA CTCL. The trial consisted of three treatment cycles. Treatments were administered twice weekly for the first 6 weeks and treatment response was determined at the end of the 8th week of each cycle. In the first double-blind treatment cycle (Cycle 1), 116 patients received HyBryte treatment (0.25% synthetic hypericin) and 50 received placebo treatment of their index lesions. A total of 16% of the patients receiving HyBryte achieved at least a 50% reduction in their lesions (graded using a standard measurement of dermatologic lesions, the CAILS score) compared to only 4% of patients in the placebo group at 8 weeks (p=0.04) during the first treatment cycle (primary endpoint). HyBryte treatment in this cycle was safe and well tolerated.

In the second open-label treatment cycle (Cycle 2), all patients received HyBryte treatment of their index lesions. Evaluation of 155 patients in this cycle (110 receiving 12 weeks of HyBryte treatment and 45 receiving 6 weeks of placebo treatment followed by 6 weeks of HyBryte treatment), demonstrated that the response rate among the 12-week treatment group was 40% (p<0.0001 vs the placebo treatment rate in Cycle 1). Comparison of the 12-week and 6-week treatment responses also revealed a statistically significant improvement (p<0.0001) between the two timepoints, indicating that continued treatment results in better outcomes. HyBryte continued to be safe and well tolerated. Additional analyses also indicated that HyBryte is equally effective in treating both plaque (response 42%, p<0.0001 relative to placebo treatment in Cycle 1) and patch (response 37%, p=0.0009 relative to placebo treatment in Cycle 1) lesions of CTCL, a particularly relevant finding given the historical difficulty in treating plaque lesions in particular.

The third (optional) treatment cycle (Cycle 3) was focused on safety and all patients could elect to receive HyBryte treatment of all their lesions. Of note, 66% of patients elected to continue with this optional compassionate use / safety cycle of the study. Of the subset of patients that received HyBryte throughout all 3 cycles of treatment, 49% of them demonstrated a positive treatment response (p<0.0001 vs patients receiving placebo in Cycle 1). Moreover, in a subset of patients evaluated in this cycle, it was demonstrated that HyBryte is not systemically available, consistent with the general safety of this topical product observed to date. At the end of Cycle 3, HyBryte continued to be well tolerated despite extended and increased use of the product to treat multiple lesions.

Overall safety of HyBryte is a critical attribute of this treatment and was monitored throughout the three treatment cycles (Cycles 1, 2 and 3) and the 6-month follow-up period. HyBryte's mechanism of action is not associated with DNA damage, making it a safer alternative than currently available therapies, all of which are associated with significant, and sometimes fatal, side effects. Predominantly these include the risk of melanoma and other malignancies, as well as the risk of significant skin damage and premature skin aging. Currently available treatments are only approved in the context of previous treatment failure with other modalities and there is no approved front-line therapy available. Within this landscape, treatment of CTCL is strongly motivated by the safety risk of each product. HyBryte potentially represents the safest available efficacious treatment for CTCL. With very limited systemic absorption, a compound that is not mutagenic and a light source that is not carcinogenic, there is no evidence to date of any potential safety issues.

Following the first Phase III study of HyBryte for the treatment of CTCL, the FDA and the EMA indicated that they would require a second successful Phase III trial to support marketing approval. With agreement from the EMA on the key design components, the second, confirmatory study, called FLASH2, is expected to be initiated before the end of 2024. This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study that will enroll approximately 80 subjects with early-stage CTCL. The FLASH2 study replicates the double-blind, placebo-controlled design used in the first successful Phase III FLASH study that consisted of three 6-week treatment cycles (18 weeks total), with the primary efficacy assessment occurring at the end of the initial 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment cycle (Cycle 1). However, this second study extends the double-blind, placebo-controlled assessment to 18 weeks of continuous treatment (no "between-Cycle" treatment breaks) with the primary endpoint assessment occurring at the end of the 18-week timepoint. In the first Phase III study, a treatment response of 49% (p<0.0001 vs patients receiving placebo in Cycle 1) was observed in patients completing 18 weeks (3 cycles) of therapy. In this second study, all important clinical study design components remain the same as in the first FLASH study, including the primary endpoint and key inclusion-exclusion criteria. The extended treatment for a continuous 18 weeks in a single cycle is expected to statistically demonstrate HyBryte's increased effect over a more prolonged, "real world" treatment course. Given the extensive engagement with the CTCL community, the esteemed Medical Advisory Board and the previous trial experience with this disease, accelerated enrollment in support of this study is anticipated, including the potential to enroll previously identified and treated HyBryte patients from the FLASH study. Discussions with the FDA on an appropriate study design remain ongoing. While collaborative, the agency has expressed a preference for a longer duration comparative study over a placebo-controlled trial. Given the shorter time to potential commercial revenue and the similar trial design to the first FLASH study afforded by the EMA accepted protocol, this study is being initiated. At the same time, discussions with the FDA will continue on potential modifications to the development path to adequately address their feedback.