EMPERIAL-Reduced and EMPERIAL-Preserved trials of Jardiance shows efficacy in chronic heart failure.- Boehringer + Eli Lilly

Boehringer and Eli Lilly announced full results from the EMPERIAL-Reduced and EMPERIAL-Preserved trials related to exercise ability and symptom improvement with Jardiance (empagliflozin) in adults with chronic heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction, respectively. As previously reported, the EMPERIAL trials showed no significant difference in change from baseline to week 12 in exercise ability with Jardiance versus placebo, as measured by the six-minute walk test, which was the primary endpoint of the studies. In EMPERIAL-Reduced, the median six-minute walk test increased by 13.5 meters with Jardiance compared with 18.0 meters with placebo. In EMPERIAL-Preserved the increase was 10.0 meters with Jardiance versus 5.0 meters with placebo. Exploratory analyses of EMPERIAL-Reduced suggest Jardiance was associated with improvements in quality of life. Researchers employed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), a widely used patient-reported measure of quality of life for heart failure. Mean improvement in total symptom score (TSS) of the KCCQ from baseline to week 12 was 4.55 points higher for Jardiance compared with placebo. Additionally, a greater proportion of those taking Jardiance had improvements compared with placebo in KCCQ-TSS of at least 5 and at least 8 points – two pre-specified thresholds that were identified to measure clinically meaningful response to treatment. Similar exploratory analyses of EMPERIAL-Preserved did not indicate improvements with Jardiance versus placebo in these same measures for adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The EMPERIAL trials included people with and without diabetes. The safety profile in those with diabetes was similar to the known safety profile of Jardiance for adults with type 2 diabetes. In those without diabetes, no new safety events were identified, and the frequency of hypoglycemic events with Jardiance in this population was similar to that of placebo. Overall, in both trials, there was no notable difference between Jardiance and placebo in the frequency of adverse events, including those leading to discontinuation of study medication, and no new safety concerns were identified. The results were presented through the European Society of Cardiology's HFA Discoveries program.