This site is intended for healthcare professionals
  • Home
  • /
  • Journals
  • /
  • Other endocrine disorders
  • /
  • Fundamental concepts regarding testosterone defici...
Journal

Fundamental concepts regarding testosterone deficiency and treatment: International expert consensus resolutions.

Read time: 1 mins
Published:21st Jun 2016
Author: <p>Morgentaler A, Zitzmann M, Traish AM, et al.</p>
Availability: Free full text
Ref.:Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016;91(7):881-896
DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.04.007

To address widespread concerns regarding the medical condition of testosterone (T) deficiency (TD) (male hypogonadism) and its treatment with T therapy, an international expert consensus conference was convened in Prague, Czech Republic, on October 1, 2015. Experts included a broad range of medical specialties including urology, endocrinology, diabetology, internal medicine, and basic science research. A representative from the European Medicines Agency participated in a nonvoting capacity. Nine resolutions were debated, with unanimous approval: (1) TD is a well-established, clinically significant medical condition that negatively affects male sexuality, reproduction, general health, and quality of life; (2) symptoms and signs of TD occur as a result of low levels of T and may benefit from treatment regardless of whether there is an identified underlying etiology; (3) TD is a global public health concern; (4) T therapy for men with TD is effective, rational, and evidence based; (5) there is no T concentration threshold that reliably distinguishes those who will respond to treatment from those who will not; (6) there is no scientific basis for any age-specific recommendations against the use of T therapy in men; (7) the evidence does not support increased risks of cardiovascular events with T therapy; (8) the evidence does not support increased risk of prostate cancer with T therapy; and (9) the evidence supports a major research initiative to explore possible benefits of T therapy for cardiometabolic disease, including diabetes. These resolutions may be considered points of agreement by a broad range of experts based on the best available scientific evidence.

Read abstract on library site

Access full article