This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Journals
  • Home
  • /
  • Journals
  • /
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and b...
  • /
  • FULFIL Trial: Once-Daily Triple Therapy for Patien...
Journal

FULFIL Trial: Once-Daily Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Read time: 1 mins
Published:15th Aug 2017
Author: Lipson DA, Barnacle H, Birk R, Brealey N, Locantore N, Lomas DA et al.
Availability: Pay for access, or by subscription
Ref.:Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(4):438-446.
DOI:10.1164/rccm.201703-0449OC

Rationale: Randomized data comparing triple therapy with dual inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are limited.

Objectives: We compared the effects of once-daily triple therapy on lung function and health-related quality of life with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy in patients with COPD.

Methods: The FULFIL (Lung Function and Quality of Life Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Closed Triple Therapy) trial was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing 24 weeks of once-daily triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol 100 μg/62.5 μg/25 μg; ELLIPTA inhaler) with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy (budesonide/formoterol 400 μg/12 μg; Turbuhaler). A patient subgroup remained on blinded treatment for up to 52 weeks. Co–primary endpoints were change from baseline in trough FEV1 and in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at Week 24.

Measurements and Main Results: In the intent-to-treat population (n = 1,810) at Week 24 for triple therapy (n = 911) and ICS/LABA therapy (n = 899), mean changes from baseline in FEV1 were 142 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 126 to 158) and −29 ml (95% CI, −46 to −13), respectively, and mean changes from baseline in SGRQ scores were −6.6 units (95% CI, −7.4 to −5.7) and −4.3 units (95% CI, −5.2 to −3.4), respectively. For both endpoints, the between-group differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant reduction in moderate/severe exacerbation rate with triple therapy versus dual ICS/LABA therapy (35% reduction; 95% CI, 14–51; P = 0.002). The safety profile of triple therapy reflected the known profiles of the components.

Conclusions: These results support the benefits of single-inhaler triple therapy compared with ICS/LABA therapy in patients with advanced COPD.

Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02345161).


Related study:
- A Comparison Study Between the Fixed Dose Triple Combination of Fluticasone Furoate/ Umeclidinium/ Vilanterol Trifenatate (FF/UMEC/VI) With Budesonide/Formoterol in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

 

Read abstract on library site

Access full article