This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Journals
  • Home
  • /
  • Journals
  • /
  • Breast Cancer
  • /
  • Body mass index in HER2-negative metastatic breast...
Journal

Body mass index in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

Read time: 1 mins
Published:16th Jan 2018
Author: Pizzuti L, Sergi D, Sperduti I, Lauro LD, Mazzotta M, Botti C et al.
Availability: Pay for access, or by subscription
Ref.:Cancer Biol Ther. 2018:0.
DOI:10.1080/15384047.2017.1416938

The evidence emerged from the TOURANDOT trial encourages evaluating the role of anthropometric determinants on treatment outcomes in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-including regimens. We thus analyzed data from a subgroup of these patients from a larger cohort previously assessed for treatment outcomes. Patients were included in the present analysis if body mass index values had been recorded at baseline. Clinical benefit rates, progression free survival and overall survival were assessed for the overall study population and subgroups defined upon molecular subtype. One hundred ninety six patients were included (N:196). Body mass index showed no impact on clinical benefit rates in the overall study sample and in luminal cancer subset (p = 0.12 and p = 0.79, respectively), but did so in the triple negative subgroup, with higher rates in patients with body mass index ≥25 (p = 0.03). In the overall study sample, body mass index did no impact progression free or overall survival OS (p = 0.33 and p = 0.67, respectively). Conversely, in triple negative patients, progression free survival was significantly longer with body mass index ≥25 (6 vs 14 months, p = 0.04). In this subset, overall survival was more favorable (25 vs 19 months, p = 0.02). The impact of the molecular subtype was confirmed in multivariate models including the length of progression free survival, and number of metastatic sites (p<0.0001). Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings in more adequately sized, ad hoc, prospective studies.

 

Read abstract on library site

Access full article