This site is intended for healthcare professionals
  • Home
  • /
  • Clinical trials
  • /
  • Zerbaxa
  • /
  • Safety and Efficacy Study to Compare IV CXA 101/Ta...
Clinical trial

Safety and Efficacy Study to Compare IV CXA 101/Tazobactam and Metronidazole With Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections

Read time: 1 mins
Last updated:1st Jun 2010

A Phase 2, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind study of CXA-101/ tazobactam (1000/500 mg q8h) and metronidazole (500 mg q8h) IV infusion vs. meropenem IV infusion (1000 mg q8h) and a matching saline placebo (q8h) in the treatment of cIAI in adult subjects. Dose adjustments for subjects with mild renal impairment are not necessary and subjects with more severe degrees of renal failure are excluded.


Study Type: Interventional
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA 101/ Tazobactam and Metronidazole With That of Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections
Enrollment: 122
Study Start Date: June 2010
Study Completion Date: March 2011
Primary Completion Date: February 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Arms:
- Experimental:
CXA 101/tazobactam and metronidazole
- Active Comparator: meropenem with matching saline placebo


Related journal: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam plus metronidazole compared with meropenem in adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Category Value
Study start date 2010-06-01

View full details